Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
302 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP95246) and 2 other sources
In the late summer of 1978, a young man named Richard Carter, known affectionately as Ricky to his friends and family, vanished from his hometown of New Bedford, Massachusetts. At 22 years old, Ricky was a United States Marine Corps veteran who had served his country in the Philippines. After his honorable service, he returned to the familiar surroundings of New Bedford, where he had grown up as one of many siblings. Upon his return, he found work assisting his uncle, a horse trainer. The last confirmed sighting of Ricky occurred over Labor Day weekend of that year, a time typically marked by the end of summer celebrations. The specific details surrounding his disappearance remain scarce, leaving a void of information for those who knew and loved him.

Richard Carter was a man of notable stature and distinct features. He stood at an impressive six feet two inches tall with an athletic build, weighing approximately 190 pounds. A light to medium complexioned man of Cape Verdean and African American descent, he had brown hair and eyes that were described as brown or hazel. Two scars marked his body; one on his left cheek and another on his stomach. These physical details, while creating a clear picture of the man he was, have unfortunately not led to any breakthroughs in his case over the many years that have passed since he was last seen.

The disappearance of Richard "Ricky" Carter has remained an open and unsolved case, a painful and lingering mystery for his family and the community of New Bedford. The passage of time has not diminished the hope for answers, and his case is now included in the Bristol County District Attorney's Office's efforts to bring resolution to cold cases. The lack of concrete leads has been a significant challenge for investigators throughout the decades. Despite the extensive period that has passed, law enforcement agencies, including the Massachusetts State Police, continue to seek any information that might shed light on what happened to the young Marine veteran who disappeared so long ago. The case is a somber reminder of the enduring pain and uncertainty that accompanies the disappearance of a loved one, a story without an ending that continues to compel a search for the truth.

Last Seen: Sep 4, 1978

Possible Unidentified Matches (9)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

83%Moderate
John Doe — Roxbury, Massachusetts - unidentified case UP16435
John Doe — Roxbury, Massachusetts
UP16435 • Found Jul 17, 1981
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 20–35 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%Black
Location 90%48 mi away, same state
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 100%6'1" vs 6'2"
Weight 59%135 lb vs 190 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
76%Possible
John Doe — Brooklyn, New York - unidentified case UP7058
John Doe — Brooklyn, New York
UP7058 • Found Nov 21, 1995
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 30–45 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%Black
Location 61%170 mi away
TimingFound 17 years after last seen
Height 100%6'1" vs 6'2"
Weight 100%180 lb vs 190 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
76%Possible
John Doe — New York, New York - unidentified case UP7496
John Doe — New York, New York
UP7496 • Found Aug 12, 1991
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 30–40 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%Black
Location 61%169 mi away
TimingFound 13 years after last seen
Height 100%6'2" vs 6'2"
Weight 88%160 lb vs 190 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
75%Possible
John Doe — Boston, Massachusetts - unidentified case UP14881
John Doe — Boston, Massachusetts
UP14881 • Found Oct 26, 1981
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 18–25 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%Black
Location 89%50 mi away, same state
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 36%5'9" vs 6'2"
Weight 47%127 lb vs 190 lb
Hair 60%Brown vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
75%Possible
John Doe — New York, New York - unidentified case UP5731
John Doe — New York, New York
UP5731 • Found Dec 11, 2003
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 40–55 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%Black
Location 61%172 mi away
TimingFound 25 years after last seen
Height 100%6'1" vs 6'2"
Weight 99%170 lb vs 190 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
75%Possible
John Doe — New York, New York - unidentified case UP6912
John Doe — New York, New York
UP6912 • Found May 28, 1996
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 25–35 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%Black
Location 61%172 mi away
TimingFound 18 years after last seen
Height 100%6'1" vs 6'2"
Weight 88%160 lb vs 190 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
75%Possible
John Doe — Queens, New York - unidentified case UP8053
John Doe — Queens, New York
UP8053 • Found Dec 23, 1993
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 30–40 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%Black
Location 63%161 mi away
TimingFound 15 years after last seen
Height 84%6'0" vs 6'2"
Weight 100%200 lb vs 190 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
75%Possible
John Doe — Queens, New York - unidentified case UP8209
John Doe — Queens, New York
UP8209 • Found Jun 29, 1990
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 30–50 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%Black
Location 63%161 mi away
TimingFound 12 years after last seen
Height 100%6'1" vs 6'2"
Weight 100%189 lb vs 190 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
75%Possible
John Doe — Bronx, New York - unidentified case UP9066
John Doe — Bronx, New York
UP9066 • Found Oct 23, 1988
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 25–50 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%Black
Location 63%162 mi away
TimingFound 10 years after last seen
Height 100%6'1" vs 6'2"
Weight 94%165 lb vs 190 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.