Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
302 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP26370) and 4 other sources
In the pre-dawn hours of January 15, 1990, the life of 22-year-old Steven James Lambert changed forever. A fisherman by trade, he was working aboard the 84-foot fishing vessel named the Jupiter, navigating the waters off the coast of his hometown, New Bedford, Massachusetts. It was on this morning that a tragic event unfolded. For reasons that remain unsettled, Steven went overboard into the vast and unforgiving ocean. The immediate response from his fellow crew members was one of urgent rescue; they tried to save him from the cold sea, but their efforts were ultimately in vain as he disappeared from sight.

The news of a man overboard prompted a significant search effort. The United States Coast Guard, along with other fishing boats in the vicinity, quickly began to scour the area in a desperate attempt to locate the young fisherman. They searched the waters thoroughly, holding onto the hope of finding him alive. Despite the extensive and collaborative search, no trace of Steven Lambert was ever found. The sea, which had provided his livelihood, had seemingly swallowed him whole, leaving behind a void of unanswered questions and a family grappling with a profound and sudden loss. He has since been presumed to be lost at sea.

Steven was a young man at the beginning of his adult life, described as a white male with brown hair and brown or hazel eyes, standing at approximately 5'7" to 5'8" and weighing between 140 and 150 pounds. The incident left the New Bedford fishing community and his loved ones in a state of shock and grief. Over the years, his case has remained open, a somber reminder of the perils faced by those who make their living on the water. The official report from the Massachusetts State Police notes the circumstances of his disappearance as having "died at sea." While he is presumed to be lost at sea, the fact that his body has never been recovered leaves a painful lack of closure for those who knew and loved him, turning a sudden accident into a lasting and unresolved tragedy.

Last Seen: Jan 15, 1990

Possible Unidentified Matches (10)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

80%Moderate
John Doe — Block Island, Rhode Island
UP12707 • Found Jan 11, 1992
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 21–26 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 90%47 mi away
TimingFound 24 months after last seen
Height 100%5'8" vs 5'7"–5'8"
79%Possible
John Doe — Brooklyn, New York - unidentified case UP7921
John Doe — Brooklyn, New York
UP7921 • Found Jun 30, 1993
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 25–40 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 61%171 mi away
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 100%5'8" vs 5'7"–5'8"
Weight 92%170 lb vs 140–150 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
79%Possible
John Doe — New York, New York - unidentified case UP7435
John Doe — New York, New York
UP7435 • Found Feb 19, 1991
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 20–30 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 61%172 mi away
TimingFound 13 months after last seen
Height 100%5'7" vs 5'7"–5'8"
Weight 99%125 lb vs 140–150 lb
Hair 60%Black vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
79%Possible
John Doe — Brooklyn, New York - unidentified case UP8534
John Doe — Brooklyn, New York
UP8534 • Found Sep 7, 1990
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 20–30 vs 22
Race 100%White
Location 61%170 mi away
TimingFound 8 months after last seen
Height 84%5'10" vs 5'7"–5'8"
Weight 100%140 lb vs 140–150 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
79%Possible
John Doe — Bronx, New York - unidentified case UP8090
John Doe — Bronx, New York
UP8090 • Found Jun 26, 1990
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 20–35 vs 22
Race 100%White
Location 63%162 mi away
TimingFound 5 months after last seen
Height 100%5'9" vs 5'7"–5'8"
Weight 100%145 lb vs 140–150 lb
Hair 60%Black vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
78%Possible
John Doe — Boston, Massachusetts
UP15971 • Found Mar 14, 2004
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 73%Est. 40–60 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 89%50 mi away, same state
TimingFound 14 years after last seen
Height 100%5'7" vs 5'7"–5'8"
Weight 100%145 lb vs 140–150 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
78%Possible
John Doe — Revere, Massachusetts - unidentified case UP14115
John Doe — Revere, Massachusetts
UP14115 • Found Aug 12, 1996
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 86%Est. 30–40 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 88%54 mi away, same state
TimingFound 7 years after last seen
Height 100%5'6" vs 5'7"–5'8"
Weight 92%170 lb vs 140–150 lb
Hair 60%Black vs Brown
78%Possible
John Doe — Brooklyn, New York - unidentified case UP7059
John Doe — Brooklyn, New York
UP7059 • Found Dec 6, 1995
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 25–35 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 61%171 mi away
TimingFound 6 years after last seen
Height 100%5'8" vs 5'7"–5'8"
Weight 100%145 lb vs 140–150 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
78%Possible
John Doe — Queens, New York - unidentified case UP8341
John Doe — Queens, New York
UP8341 • Found Oct 7, 1992
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 18–30 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 63%161 mi away
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 100%5'7" vs 5'7"–5'8"
Weight 84%114 lb vs 140–150 lb
Hair 60%Black vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
78%Possible
John Doe — Bronx, New York - unidentified case UP8097
John Doe — Bronx, New York
UP8097 • Found Dec 31, 1990
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 20–40 vs 22
Race 100%White
Location 63%162 mi away
TimingFound 12 months after last seen
Height 100%5'7" vs 5'7"–5'8"
Weight 100%141 lb vs 140–150 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.