Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
302 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP12541) and 7 other sources
James Garfield Broome, a 42-year-old man, vanished from Jersey City, New Jersey, under circumstances that remain unclear. Known also by his middle name, Garfield, he was last officially seen on July 1, 1998. At the time of his disappearance, he was described as a Black male, standing between 5'5' and 5'8' tall, and weighing between 130 and 150 pounds. He had black, balding hair, brown eyes, and a mustache. The details surrounding what he was wearing or what he was doing on the day he went missing have not been made public, leaving a void of information for his loved ones and investigators. The lack of specific circumstances surrounding his disappearance has made the search for answers a difficult and prolonged effort for both his family and law enforcement.

The investigation into James Broome's disappearance is being handled by the New Jersey State Police Missing Persons Unit. Despite the passage of time, the case remains open as they continue to seek information that could lead to his whereabouts. A significant development in the case came in 2001, when there was a possible sighting of him in Morristown, New Jersey. This lead prompted the Morristown Police Department to also become involved in the search. In an effort to generate new leads, the New Jersey State Police released an age-progressed photo of what Broome might look like at 66 years old. This visual aid is a crucial tool in long-term missing person cases, helping the public to recognize individuals who may look different after many years.

The years have turned into decades, yet the search for James Garfield Broome continues. His case is a poignant reminder of the enduring pain and uncertainty that families of missing persons experience. Law enforcement agencies, including the New Jersey State Police and the Morristown Police Department, continue to ask for the public's help. The overview of this case is one of quiet disappearance, with very few public details to construct a narrative of his last known moments. The possible sighting in Morristown offers a glimmer of hope, but without further information, it remains an unconfirmed lead in a case that has left a family without answers for far too long.

Last Seen: Jul 1, 1998

Possible Unidentified Matches (10)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

86%Strong
John Doe — New York, New York - unidentified case UP6281
John Doe — New York, New York
UP6281 • Found Jul 5, 1998
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 40–60 vs 42
Race 100%Black
Location 100%6 mi away
TimingFound 4 days after last seen
Height 100%5'5" vs 5'5"–5'8"
Weight 100%120 lb vs 130–150 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
85%Strong
John Doe — East Orange, New Jersey
UP1540 • Found May 15, 2000
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 40–44 vs 42 when missing
Race 100%Black
Location 100%7 mi away, same state
TimingFound 23 months after last seen
Height 100%5'5" vs 5'5"–5'8"
Weight 79%101 lb vs 130–150 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
85%Strong
John Doe — New York, New York - unidentified case UP6129
John Doe — New York, New York
UP6129 • Found Jun 2, 1999
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 25–45 vs 42
Race 100%Black
Location 100%4 mi away
TimingFound 11 months after last seen
Height 100%5'4" vs 5'5"–5'8"
Weight 100%120 lb vs 130–150 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
84%Moderate
John Doe — Yonkers, New York
UP16260 • Found Mar 24, 2005
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 38–52 vs 42 when missing
Race 100%Black
Location 98%18 mi away
TimingFound 7 years after last seen
Height 100%5'5" vs 5'5"–5'8"
Weight 100%138 lb vs 130–150 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
84%Moderate
John Doe — Irvington, New York
UP16451 • Found Nov 25, 1998
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 35–45 vs 42
Race 100%Black
Location 96%24 mi away
TimingFound 5 months after last seen
Height 100%5'5" vs 5'5"–5'8"
Weight 8%216 lb vs 130–150 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
84%Moderate
John Doe — New York, New York - unidentified case UP12401
John Doe — New York, New York
UP12401 • Found Jul 1, 2013
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 35–50 vs 42 when missing
Race 100%Black
Location 100%4 mi away
TimingFound 15 years after last seen
Height 100%5'5" vs 5'5"–5'8"
Weight 100%154 lb vs 130–150 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
84%Moderate
John Doe — New York, New York - unidentified case UP5537
John Doe — New York, New York
UP5537 • Found Apr 27, 2007
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 45–55 vs 42 when missing
Race 100%Black
Location 100%4 mi away
TimingFound 9 years after last seen
Height 100%5'7" vs 5'5"–5'8"
Weight 86%174 lb vs 130–150 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
84%Moderate
John Doe — Newark, New Jersey - unidentified case UP1747
John Doe — Newark, New Jersey
UP1747 • Found Jun 2, 2003
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 42–57 vs 42 when missing
Race 100%Black
Location 100%5 mi away, same state
TimingFound 5 years after last seen
Height 100%5'7" vs 5'5"–5'8"
Weight 100%128 lb vs 130–150 lb
Hair 40%Gray vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
84%Moderate
John Doe — Bronx, New York - unidentified case UP6090
John Doe — Bronx, New York
UP6090 • Found Oct 17, 2000
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 45–70 vs 42 when missing
Race 100%Black
Location 99%14 mi away
TimingFound 2 years after last seen
Height 100%5'7" vs 5'5"–5'8"
Weight 94%168 lb vs 130–150 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
84%Moderate
John Doe — New York, New York - unidentified case UP6087
John Doe — New York, New York
UP6087 • Found Sep 19, 2000
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 78%Est. 25–40 vs 42 when missing
Race 100%Black
Location 100%4 mi away
TimingFound 2 years after last seen
Height 100%5'9" vs 5'5"–5'8"
Weight 100%140 lb vs 130–150 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.