Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
302 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP74376)
Hugo Vanegas-Ramirez, a 24-year-old male, was last seen in McAllen, Texas, on June 22, 2007. At the time of his disappearance, he was reported missing to local authorities.

Despite efforts by law enforcement and the community, there has been little information available regarding the circumstances of Hugo's disappearance. Public records and missing person databases provide minimal details, and no significant leads have been reported in the media.

The case of Hugo Vanegas-Ramirez remains unsolved, and he is still listed as a missing person. Authorities continue to seek any information that could shed light on his whereabouts or the events leading up to his disappearance. Anyone with relevant information is encouraged to contact the McAllen Police Department or submit a tip through appropriate channels.
Last Seen: Jun 22, 2007

Links to Additional Sources (0)

See any mistakes? Let us know!

Possible Unidentified Matches (10)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

81%Moderate
John Doe — Mission, Texas
UP81370 • Found May 23, 2021
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 16–29 vs 23–24 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 100%3 mi away, same county
TimingFound 14 years after last seen
Height 100%5'6" vs 5'7"
Weight 100%167 lb vs 100–200 lb
80%Moderate
John Doe — Mission, Texas
UP9532 • Found Jul 5, 2008
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 20–30 vs 23–24 when missing
Race 60%White
Location 100%6 mi away, same county
TimingFound 12 months after last seen
Height 100%5'7" vs 5'7"
Weight 100%140 lb vs 100–200 lb
80%Moderate
John Doe — Texas
UP2952 • Found Apr 1, 2008
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 20–30 vs 23–24
Race 60%White
Location 98%18 mi away, same county
TimingFound 9 months after last seen
Height 100%5'7" vs 5'7"
Weight 100%155 lb vs 100–200 lb
80%Moderate
John Doe — La Joya, Texas
UP9560 • Found Mar 12, 2008
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 20–30 vs 23–24
Race 60%White
Location 98%16 mi away, same county
TimingFound 9 months after last seen
Height 100%5'8" vs 5'7"
Weight 100%140 lb vs 100–200 lb
80%Moderate
John Doe — La Joya, Texas
UP3009 • Found Jul 13, 2007
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 20–29 vs 23–24
Race 60%White
Location 98%16 mi away, same county
TimingFound 3 weeks after last seen
Height 100%5'6" vs 5'7"
Weight 100%160 lb vs 100–200 lb
79%Possible
John Doe — Brownsville, Texas - unidentified case UP127601
John Doe — Brownsville, Texas
UP127601 • Found Jun 18, 2024
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 38–52 vs 23–24 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 91%43 mi away, same state
TimingFound 17 years after last seen
Height 100%5'8" vs 5'7"
Weight 100%160 lb vs 100–200 lb
79%Possible
John Doe — Pharr, Texas
UP104060 • Found Apr 11, 2023
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 18–32 vs 23–24 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 100%3 mi away, same county
TimingFound 16 years after last seen
Height 84%5'5" vs 5'7"
Weight 100%192 lb vs 100–200 lb
79%Possible
John Doe — Brownsville, Texas
UP82530 • Found Jan 4, 2012
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 26–40 vs 23–24 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 89%50 mi away, same state
TimingFound 5 years after last seen
Height 100%5'4"–5'7" vs 5'7"
79%Possible
John Doe — Texas
UP14328 • Found Sep 5, 2011
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 23–35 vs 23–24 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 87%57 mi away, same state
TimingFound 4 years after last seen
Height 100%5'5"–5'9" vs 5'7"
79%Possible
John Doe — Texas - unidentified case UP14007
John Doe — Texas
UP14007 • Found May 21, 2011
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 18–26 vs 23–24 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 87%57 mi away, same state
TimingFound 4 years after last seen
Height 100%5'6" vs 5'7"

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.