Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
302 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP92971) and 2 other sources
On a spring day in March of 1972, the life of 32-year-old Antone Flores took a tragic and mysterious turn in the waters of Westport, Massachusetts. On March 23rd, the boat he was on overturned within the confines of Westport Harbor, leading to his sudden disappearance. In the immediate aftermath, there was no trace of Antone, leaving his loved ones and the community in a state of uncertainty and distress. The initial search and rescue efforts were met with no success, and as days turned into weeks, the hope of finding him alive began to diminish, marking the beginning of a long and painful chapter for his family.

For more than two and a half years, the case of Antone Flores remained without any significant developments. The quiet coastal town was left to wonder about the fate of the man who had vanished so abruptly. The family endured a prolonged period of grieving without the closure of knowing what had become of their beloved Antone. The waters that had been a source of livelihood and recreation for the community held a somber secret, and the lack of answers was a heavy burden for all who knew him.

A sense of partial closure finally arrived on December 14, 1974, when partial remains were discovered on Little Ram Island, an area within Westport Harbor. Investigators were able to make a presumptive identification of Antone Flores based on the clothing and personal items that were found with the remains. This somber discovery confirmed that Antone's life had ended that fateful day in 1972. However, the discovery was incomplete as no skull was ever recovered, leaving some questions unanswered. The case, while providing a degree of resolution, remains a poignant reminder of the sea's power and the enduring pain of a family's loss. An overview of the case reflects a tragic accident that led to a lengthy period of uncertainty, followed by the eventual, albeit incomplete, recovery of a loved one, bringing a close to the active search but leaving a permanent void in the hearts of his family.

Last Seen: Mar 23, 1972

Possible Unidentified Matches (10)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

79%Possible
John Doe — Boston, Massachusetts - unidentified case UP15715
John Doe — Boston, Massachusetts
UP15715 • Found Jul 20, 2016
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 60–65 vs 32 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 88%55 mi away, same state
TimingFound 44 years after last seen
Height 100%5'8" vs 5'9"
Weight 100%181 lb vs 170 lb
Hair 70%Gray vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
79%Possible
John Doe — Boston, Massachusetts - unidentified case UP15425
John Doe — Boston, Massachusetts
UP15425 • Found Mar 2, 1982
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 40–50 vs 32 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 88%55 mi away, same state
TimingFound 10 years after last seen
Height 100%5'8" vs 5'9"
Weight 96%150 lb vs 170 lb
Hair 40%Gray vs Black
78%Possible
John Doe — Salem, Massachusetts - unidentified case UP15219
John Doe — Salem, Massachusetts
UP15219 • Found Jan 13, 2007
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 60–61 vs 32 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 85%66 mi away, same state
TimingFound 35 years after last seen
Height 84%5'7" vs 5'9"
Weight 100%159 lb vs 170 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
78%Possible
John Doe — Marlboro, Massachusetts - unidentified case UP15801
John Doe — Marlboro, Massachusetts
UP15801 • Found Sep 14, 2006
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 55–57 vs 32 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 87%59 mi away, same state
TimingFound 34 years after last seen
Height 100%5'8" vs 5'9"
Weight 95%149 lb vs 170 lb
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
78%Possible
John Doe — Lynn, Massachusetts - unidentified case UP15537
John Doe — Lynn, Massachusetts
UP15537 • Found Aug 4, 2006
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 58–72 vs 32 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 86%62 mi away, same state
TimingFound 34 years after last seen
Height 100%5'10" vs 5'9"
Weight 88%143 lb vs 170 lb
Hair 70%Gray vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
77%Possible
John Doe — Somerville, Massachusetts - unidentified case UP14725
John Doe — Somerville, Massachusetts
UP14725 • Found Dec 13, 2009
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 44–46 vs 32 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 87%57 mi away, same state
TimingFound 38 years after last seen
Height 100%5'8" vs 5'9"
Weight 100%182 lb vs 170 lb
Hair 60%Brown vs Black
77%Possible
John Doe — Norwalk, Connecticut
UP8937 • Found Jul 27, 1973
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 30–40 vs 32 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 70%126 mi away
TimingFound 16 months after last seen
Height 100%5'10" vs 5'9"
Weight 100%175 lb vs 170 lb
Hair 15%Red vs Black
76%Possible
John Doe — East Bridgewater, Massachusetts - unidentified case UP15220
John Doe — East Bridgewater, Massachusetts
UP15220 • Found Feb 9, 2008
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 59–60 vs 32 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 94%33 mi away, same state
TimingFound 36 years after last seen
Height 100%5'8" vs 5'9"
Weight 0%278 lb vs 170 lb
Hair 70%Gray vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
76%Possible
John Doe — Revere, Massachusetts - unidentified case UP14115
John Doe — Revere, Massachusetts
UP14115 • Found Aug 12, 1996
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 30–40 vs 32 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 87%58 mi away, same state
TimingFound 24 years after last seen
Height 68%5'6" vs 5'9"
Weight 100%170 lb vs 170 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
76%Possible
John Doe — Burlington, Massachusetts - unidentified case UP14005
John Doe — Burlington, Massachusetts
UP14005 • Found May 22, 1975
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 25–35 vs 32 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 85%65 mi away, same state
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 68%6'0" vs 5'9"
Hair 60%Brown vs Black

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.