Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
302 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP88614)
Francisco Trejo Gonzalez, a 28-year-old man, was last seen on September 21, 2021, in Laredo, Texas. His disappearance has garnered attention from both local law enforcement and the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS), but despite efforts, no significant leads have emerged. His case remains active and open, with authorities urging anyone with information to step forward.

Details surrounding the circumstances of his disappearance are still unclear, but it is believed that foul play may have been involved. Investigators continue to seek the public's help in locating Gonzalez, and anyone with knowledge of his whereabouts is encouraged to contact the DPS Missing Persons Clearinghouse or local law enforcement. His family and community remain hopeful for answers as the search continues.
Last Seen: Sep 21, 2021

Links to Additional Sources (0)

See any mistakes? Let us know!

Possible Unidentified Matches (10)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

82%Moderate
John Doe — Texas
UP137849 • Found Jan 14, 2022
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 20–35 vs 28
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 93%37 mi away, same county
TimingFound 4 months after last seen
Height 100%5'3"–5'6" vs 5'5"–10'0"
79%Possible
John Doe — Pharr, Texas
UP104060 • Found Apr 11, 2023
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 18–32 vs 28 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 71%122 mi away, same state
TimingFound 19 months after last seen
Height 100%5'5" vs 5'5"–10'0"
Weight 100%192 lb vs 190 lb
Hair 60%Brown vs Black
79%Possible
John Doe — Texas
UP89106 • Found Sep 7, 2021
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 25–38 vs 28
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 79%86 mi away, same state
TimingFound same day as last seen
Height 100%5'2"–5'7" vs 5'5"–10'0"
78%Possible
John Doe — Texas
UP97762 • Found Jun 24, 2022
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 28–49 vs 28
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 79%86 mi away, same state
TimingFound 9 months after last seen
Height 100%5'5"–5'9" vs 5'5"–10'0"
Hair 100%Black vs Black
77%Possible
John Doe — Texas
UP107455 • Found Aug 8, 2023
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 28–42 vs 28 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 70%124 mi away, same state
TimingFound 23 months after last seen
Height 100%5'4" vs 5'5"–10'0"
Weight 21%109 lb vs 190 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
77%Possible
John Doe — Brackettville, Texas
UP93228 • Found Apr 23, 2022
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 30–35 vs 28
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 68%137 mi away, same state
TimingFound 7 months after last seen
Height 100%5'3"–5'5" vs 5'5"–10'0"
Weight 99%140–170 lb vs 190 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
76%Possible
John Doe — Texas
UP90092 • Found Jan 27, 2022
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 26–41 vs 28
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 79%86 mi away, same state
TimingFound 4 months after last seen
Height 75%5'2"–5'9" vs 5'5"–10'0"
76%Possible
John Doe — Texas
UP85709 • Found Oct 20, 2021
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 24–40 vs 28
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 79%86 mi away, same state
TimingFound 4 weeks after last seen
Height 100%5'0"–5'5" vs 5'5"–10'0"
75%Possible
John Doe — Mission, Texas
UP136377 • Found Oct 29, 2024
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 28–42 vs 28 when missing
Race 60%White
Location 72%115 mi away, same state
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 100%5'4" vs 5'5"–10'0"
Weight 77%149 lb vs 190 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
75%Possible
John Doe — Austin, Texas
UP132777 • Found Sep 29, 2024
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 20–40 vs 28 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 53%219 mi away, same state
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 100%5'9" vs 5'5"–10'0"
Weight 100%181 lb vs 190 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.