Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
302 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP27934) and 7 other sources
Brent Marshall Acomb, aged 54, went missing from Houston, Texas, on January 24, 2014. Following an argument with his girlfriend, Brent left his apartment with only a change of underwear, leaving behind essential belongings such as his wallet, clothes, and gun. He has not been seen or heard from since. At the time of his disappearance, Brent was described as being 5'10" to 6'0" tall, weighing around 165 pounds, with red hair and blue eyes. He was last seen wearing a t-shirt and blue jeans.

The case has left investigators with few leads, and despite efforts by the Harris County Sheriff’s Office and missing persons organizations, Brent's whereabouts remain unknown. His family continues to search for answers and has appealed to the public for any information that could help resolve the case.

Last Seen: Jan 24, 2014

Possible Unidentified Matches (10)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

81%Moderate
John Doe — Baytown, Texas
UP16122 • Found Oct 16, 2016
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 50–65 vs 54 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 94%32 mi away, same county
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 100%5'11" vs 5'10"–5'11"
79%Possible
John Doe — Houston, Texas
UP51409 • Found Jul 11, 2018
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 45–60 vs 54 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 97%22 mi away, same county
TimingFound 4 years after last seen
Height 68%6'2" vs 5'10"–5'11"
Weight 80%132 lb vs 165 lb
79%Possible
John Doe — Houston, Texas
UP15921 • Found Sep 4, 2016
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 50–70 vs 54 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 98%16 mi away, same county
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 100%5'10" vs 5'10"–5'11"
79%Possible
John Doe — Houston, Texas - unidentified case UP15518
John Doe — Houston, Texas
UP15518 • Found May 12, 2016
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 50–70 vs 54 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 98%18 mi away, same county
TimingFound 2 years after last seen
Height 100%5'11" vs 5'10"–5'11"
78%Possible
John Doe — Houston, Texas
UP86759 • Found Sep 8, 2021
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 58–72 vs 54 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 98%16 mi away, same county
TimingFound 8 years after last seen
Height 84%5'8" vs 5'10"–5'11"
78%Possible
John Doe — Cypress, Texas
UP79691 • Found Feb 21, 2021
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 48–62 vs 54 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 99%13 mi away, same county
TimingFound 7 years after last seen
Height 75%5'9"–6'4" vs 5'10"–5'11"
78%Possible
John Doe — Humble, Texas - unidentified case UP13451
John Doe — Humble, Texas
UP13451 • Found Nov 27, 2014
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 72%Est. 60–70 vs 54
Race 100%White
Location 100%11 mi away, same county
TimingFound 10 months after last seen
Height 100%5'9" vs 5'10"–5'11"
Hair 40%Gray vs Red
77%Possible
John Doe — Houston, Texas
UP16129 • Found Nov 4, 2016
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 45–65 vs 54 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 98%16 mi away, same county
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 84%5'8" vs 5'10"–5'11"
76%Possible
John Doe — Pasadena, Texas
UP95762 • Found Aug 2, 2022
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 50–70 vs 54 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 95%28 mi away, same county
TimingFound 9 years after last seen
Height 100%5'5"–5'11" vs 5'10"–5'11"
76%Possible
John Doe — Houston, Texas - unidentified case UP136464
John Doe — Houston, Texas
UP136464 • Found Jan 6, 2025
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 84%Est. 38–52 vs 54 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 96%25 mi away, same county
TimingFound 11 years after last seen
Height 100%5'10" vs 5'10"–5'11"
Weight 0%249 lb vs 165 lb
Hair 50%Brown vs Red
Eyes 100%Blue vs Blue

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.