Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
302 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP51139)
Juan Tzaj Xocol, a 22-year-old male, was last seen on November 29, 2017, in McAllen, Texas. Details surrounding his disappearance remain scarce, with little publicly known about the events leading up to that day. He was reported missing and is listed in the National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs) under case number MP51139. At the time of his disappearance, Tzaj Xocol was described as being 5'2" tall, weighing around 130 pounds, with black hair.

Efforts to locate him have been ongoing, but no significant developments have been publicly reported. His case remains unresolved, and authorities continue to encourage anyone with information to come forward. Despite the passage of time, his family and the community hold out hope for answers, relying on the public's assistance to shed light on his whereabouts.
Last Seen: Nov 29, 2017

Links to Additional Sources (0)

See any mistakes? Let us know!

Possible Unidentified Matches (10)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

82%Moderate
John Doe — Texas
UP107455 • Found Aug 8, 2023
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 97%Est. 28–42 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 100%7 mi away, same county
TimingFound 6 years after last seen
Height 84%5'4" vs 5'2"
Weight 88%109 lb vs 130 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
82%Moderate
John Doe — Hidalgo, Texas - unidentified case UP93259
John Doe — Hidalgo, Texas
UP93259 • Found Jun 28, 2022
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 18–32 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 100%7 mi away, same county
TimingFound 5 years after last seen
Height 100%5'2" vs 5'2"
Weight 26%77 lb vs 130 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
82%Moderate
John Doe — Hidalgo, Texas - unidentified case UP84194
John Doe — Hidalgo, Texas
UP84194 • Found Aug 17, 2021
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 18–32 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 100%7 mi away, same county
TimingFound 4 years after last seen
Height 100%5'3" vs 5'2"
Weight 19%74 lb vs 130 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
81%Moderate
John Doe — Texas - unidentified case UP82852
John Doe — Texas
UP82852 • Found Dec 15, 2019
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 24–37 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 91%43 mi away, same state
TimingFound 2 years after last seen
Height 100%5'2"–5'6" vs 5'2"
81%Moderate
John Doe — Texas
UP73055 • Found Jan 10, 2018
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 19–27 vs 22
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 91%44 mi away, same state
TimingFound 6 weeks after last seen
Height 100%5'1"–5'5" vs 5'2"
81%Moderate
John Doe — Texas
UP81884 • Found Jan 6, 2018
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 21–31 vs 22
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 91%44 mi away, same state
TimingFound 5 weeks after last seen
Height 100%4'10"–5'2" vs 5'2"
80%Moderate
John Doe — La Joya, Texas
UP75426 • Found Oct 9, 2020
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 18–32 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 98%16 mi away, same county
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 100%5'3" vs 5'2"
Weight 0%40 lb vs 130 lb
Hair 60%Brown vs Black
80%Moderate
John Doe — Texas
UP76887 • Found Jan 10, 2019
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 19–29 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 87%57 mi away, same state
TimingFound 13 months after last seen
Height 100%5'3"–5'7" vs 5'2"
80%Moderate
John Doe — Texas
UP58809 • Found Jan 7, 2018
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 90%Est. 23–37 vs 22
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 91%44 mi away, same state
TimingFound 6 weeks after last seen
Height 100%5'0"–5'5" vs 5'2"
80%Moderate
John Doe — Texas - unidentified case UP79542
John Doe — Texas
UP79542 • Found Jan 7, 2018
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 22–33 vs 22
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 91%44 mi away, same state
TimingFound 6 weeks after last seen
Height 84%5'4"–5'9" vs 5'2"

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.